News and Resources

Case Analysis: Push Payment Fraud

19 / 11 / 2019

David McIlroy explores the Supreme Court decision in Singularis Holdings Ltd (in liquidation) v Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Ltd [2019] UKSC 50 and considers its implications for Authorised Push Payment Fraud claims.

This case analysis looks at the extent of a bank’s Quincecare duty, the ability to attribute the dishonesty of the controlling mind in a ‘one-man company’ to the company itself, and the voluntary Contingent Reimbursement Model Code for Authorised Push Payment Scams.

You can download David’s case analysis here.

icon-arrow-right icon-chevron-small-left-white icon-chevron-small-left icon-chevron-up icon-circle-arrow-right icon-linkedin icon-quote-marks icon-search-circle icon-search icon-twitter